For Epiphany 2


Simon and Andrew are seekers, followers of John the Baptist, Jesus’ cousin and mentor. They are part of a reform movement within Jewish national life, a movement that seeks to restore the faithfulness of Israel to the mission of God. In the synoptic gospels, the movement’s direction and the heart of the matter is described as “the kingdom of heaven” or “the kingdom of God”, and Jesus is the focal figure who proclaims and enacts that kingdom and its ethic of love and justice. In the synoptic gospels, Jesus inaugurates something; his death and resurrection come to be understood as the embodiment of the sacrificial love in which the kingdom is founded, and the vindication of that love in the resurrection.

In this fourth gospel, the focus shifts from “the Kingdom” to “the Lamb”. Much of what formed us as disciples in the church of the last several centuries has taken its cue from this shift, interpreting Jesus almost exclusively in terms of the atoning sacrifice (the lamb) of God – God’s self-offering in the Word incarnate.  “For God so loved the world….”

In much of western Christianity, however, God’s self-offering has been distorted by a lens of guilt and punishment; we have offended against “the law” and the just judge must sentence us. But the just judge makes a sacrifice of his son to endure our death sentence. It’s all so objective, so cold, and so distant from any real understanding of the sacrificial death of Jesus.

A more ancient way of understanding Jesus as God’s self-offering – the lamb of God – is in terms of covenant broken and restored in a divine-human act of cooperation. Because Jesus who dies on the cross is not the disembodied Word, but the Word become flesh (as John has taken pains to describe him the opening words of his Gospel) the cross becomes a meeting place at which the divine and the human join in sacrifice. That word, “sacrifice” does not mean “giving up” or “enduring pain”, but “making holy”. In this act of shared – of covenantal – love, human holiness is restored in the mending of the divine-human covenant.

I’ve found that’s how it actually works, by the way, in human relationships. There is not, in my experience of harm inflicted or endured, some objective “law” that has been broken, but instead a relationship that has come apart. Every time I’ve imagined that someone has needed to “make it right” with me, it has turned out that “making it right” is something that involves both sides of a broken covenant. And every time I have tried to “make it right” with another, it has become clear that, without that other’s willing participation, including forgiveness, the relationship remains torn. Torn relationships cannot be mended from one side or the other alone, but only in a shared commitment to mend together, in a matrix of remorse and forgiveness – of justice and love – that is costly to both sides. This commitment to justice on the part of the offender, and to love on the part of the one who is wronged, is the basis of reconciliation, of the restoration of a covenant torn by carelessness, fear, or greed.

It is also, of course, the ethic of the kingdom, the kingdom which Jesus proclaimed and embodied as he mended the torn covenant and restored the holy purpose we share with God.  For God so loved the world….

Comments

  1. Bear TeekaJanuary 14, 2011 at 5:42 PM

    Awesome! Thanks from your #1 Florida fan.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fr. Aaron OrearJanuary 16, 2011 at 5:18 AM

    I think the key is in "the sin of the world." It's singular, not plural.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jesus-the-Friendship-of-God

Here’s the end of the gospel portion read at Valerie’s funeral: “Thomas said, ‘Lord, we do not know where you are going. How can we know the way?’ Jesus said, ‘I am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’”  It’s a tough text for a preacher in a multi-faith world. It can easily seem as if Christians are claiming unique access to the divine homecoming based on having chosen – or inherited – the right religious beliefs. But Jesus isn’t talking about Christianity. He’s not talking about beliefs. He is talking about the human embodiment of the Friendship of God as the way home to God.  In the preaching moment, there was lots of material for a homily without venturing into those difficult waters. So it  was not until a few days later that I realized the way the text and the occasion might have worked together. You see, I was preaching at the funeral of a friend. Not just my friend, though she was that. But a friend . Friend was who she was, he
Read more

Truth to speak as we wait: An Advent Litany

Let us ask God to restore us to a place of Advent waiting.  One:     A gainst the darkness of waiting,  All:        we dazzle ourselves with a garish neon skyline of our own making.                   We are blind to the rising Star of your New Creation.  One:      Against the silence of waiting,  All:        we fill our ears with the clatter of common sense.                  We are deaf to the tone and the tempo of your Song.  One:      Against the uncertainty of waiting,  All:       we hide in the stale air of closed rooms.                  We miss the scent of your Beauty as it passes through our streets.  One:      Against the nakedness of waiting,  All:         we hide our skin from the hardness and harm of the world.                   We miss your healing Touch: warm, loving, strong.  One:      Against the hunger of waiting,  All:        we fill our mouths with the same stale cake as always.                  We miss the Food of angels on your table.  One:      O God
Read more

Jesus the Welcomed Stranger

Matthew 25. 14-30, November 19, 2023: “Pentecost 25”  Matthew 25. 31-46, November 26, 2023: “The Reign of Christ”  I wonder if we really believe that Jesus is proposing the slaves who double their master’s money as spiritual models, as kingdom-ready exemplary followers of the way of Jesus. Or if, as in the case the wise and ungenerous bridesmaids in the previous parable, their cleverness invites some measure of scepticism towards the idea that we are to emulate them. I wonder if we’re ready to see this as another instance of Jesus telling a story to provoke a probing spiritual and ethical examination of what it means to enter into the fullness of our humanity, to live a “good life”.  All by itself, without the parable that precedes it and the eschatological drama that follows (and if you can overlook the pretty broad smirk in the story when it commends usury as more-or-less “better than nothing”) this could be the story it’s been fashioned into by so many – a story commending the inv
Read more